Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 11:04:44 03/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2000 at 11:44:12, Shep wrote: > >Yes, hashtables were cleared (I actually ran the position twice on DJ; the >second time I had just started the machine, so nothing was in memory). I used >the Fritz 6 GUI and 128 MB hash, running on Win98, no dual CPU, no overclocking. >Do you have Nimzo or Hiarcs to check their solution times compared to mine? >Tiger also solved this one, but I don't remember the solution time. > >--- >Shep This is how Rebel-Tiger analyses this position after 1h on a P3-450 with 64MB hash, finishing 14 ply. It chooses Nxf2 after 5m55s but rejects it after 10m26s. I will try Shredder4 later this evening. An interresting position, because it is not quite clear to me what the best move is here. 00:00:00.8 0,06 6 45420 Bd7 a3 Nf6 b4 00:00:02.9 0,00 7 200587 Bd7 h3 Nf6 b3 b5 a4 00:00:05.6 0,06 8 510971 Bd7 a3 Nf6 b3 Nh5 00:00:17.8 -0,04 9 1415553 Bd7 a3 Nf6 h3 Bc6 Nf3 Nh5 Bxe5 00:00:20.8 -0,02 9 1759664 b6 00:00:31.3 0,16 9 2736746 b6 b3 00:00:48.7 0,12 10 4358808 b6 f3 00:01:38.5 0,08 11 8708234 b6 f3 Nf6 Qf2 Bb7 Re1 Rfc8 Rac1 Nh5 00:04:47.6 0,14 12 26727542 b6 f3 Nf6 Rac1 Bb7 Bb1 Nfd7 00:05:55.1 0,16 12 34714031 Nxf2 00:07:42.8 0,44 12 47158757 Nxf2 Qxf2 Ng4 Qe2 Qb6+ c5 Qxb2 Nb3 00:08:54.8 -0,04 13 55660379 Nxf2 Qxf2 Ng4 Qe2 Qb6+ c5 Qxb2 Nb3 Qxc3 Rac1 Ne5 Bb1 Qb4 cxd6 b6 00:10:26.2 -0,02 13 65002419 b6 00:13:40.2 0,08 13 84718441 b6 f3 Nf6 Rac1 Bb7 Bb1 Qc5+ 00:42:27.8 0,06 14 261252334 b6 Bg3 Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.