Author: Chessfun
Date: 00:10:07 03/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2000 at 03:07:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On March 09, 2000 at 02:53:17, Chessfun wrote: >>You yourself had quoted good results of Didzis....these good results >>were at game 60 ponder off on one 200 mmx computer. You cannot have >>it both ways.....claim they are good when it serves your purpose >>then critique the time when it does not so good. >> >>This is also ponder on on a Cel 433 at those same time controls so it >>should act better than at Didzis. > >if you have a k6-3/450 test how many nps cstal does on it in relation to >celeron433. >i do not complain. i just want to explain your results. >there is always a reason, a sense. nothing happens without sense. > > >>Didzis played two tourneys at 1 hour both are listed on his website. >>From what I saw in those two games I have played thus far it is hard >>to understand how or why this wasn't already known. And if it was as >>you stated.......why wasn't it fixed. >> >>It's a shame the first game was a very nice game. > >the bug is not fixed. chris is not interested in fixing it. >he is even not ionteresting in programming chess again. he retired because >he felt that whole scene of computerchess and it's people boring like hell. >there will be no cstal3 or any bugfix anymore. chris has given up >computerchess. If that be the case, then why does he bother appearing here at times under different names? And why open up a chess forum if you have given up on it.? > > >>Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.