Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A bridge too far... / Another try with crafty

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:53:40 03/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 10, 2000 at 13:12:25, blass uri wrote:

>On March 10, 2000 at 11:30:44, pete wrote:
>
>>On March 09, 2000 at 06:22:27, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>>
>>>>I am still interested though that if Bringer said mate in 18 is it sure it also
>>>>can reach it ?
>>>
>>>That I don't know for sure: the author of Bringer could know that.
>>>But I suspect that an announced mate *is* a forced mate, just the same
>>>way others do it, also.
>>>
>>>After 10 hours of crunching on a PIII/550 with 500MB hash table
>>>Chest 3.19 states "no mate in 16".  Somewhere in the search there
>>>have been some partial "mate in 13", so a mate in 18 appears plausible
>>>to me.  May be there is no shorter mate at all, which lets me wonder
>>>how Bringer managed to find this mate... respect.
>>>
>>>Heiner Marxen   heiner@drb.insel.de     http://www.drb.insel.de/~heiner/
>>
>>As I still was curious I fed it again in crafty , this time on a faster system
>>with no tablebases ; the result was quite strange :
>>
>>book file disabled.
>>pondering disabled.
>>playing a computer!
>>hash table memory = 384M bytes.
>>pawn hash table memory = 64M bytes.
>>max threads set to 4
>>
>>Crafty v17.9 (4 cpus)
>>
>>White(1): setboard 8/8/5p2/5p2/5P2/3p3B/5k1P/3K4 w
>>
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    8  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    7  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    6  |   |   |   |   |   | *P|   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    5  |   |   |   |   |   | *P|   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    4  |   |   |   |   |   | P |   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    3  |   |   |   | *P|   |   |   | B |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    2  |   |   |   |   |   | *K|   | P |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>    1  |   |   |   | K |   |   |   |   |
>>       +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>         a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
>>
>>White(1): analyze
>>end-game phase
>>              clearing hash tables
>>              time surplus   0.00  time limit 30.00 (3:00)
>>         nss  depth   time  score   variation (1)
>>starting thread 1
>>starting thread 2
>>starting thread 3
>>
>>...
>>
>>         24     7:40     ++   1. Bg2!!
>>               24    20:41  10.11   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 d2 5. h7 Kg5 6. h8=Q Kg4 7. Qxf6
>>                                    Kf4 8. Kxd2 Ke4 9. Qe6+ Kd4 10. Qxf5
>>                                    Kc4 11. Qe5 Kb4 12. Qd5 Ka3 13. Qb5
>>                                    Ka2 14. Kc3
>>               24->  24:09  10.11   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 d2 5. h7 Kg5 6. h8=Q Kg4 7. Qxf6
>>                                    Kf4 8. Kxd2 Ke4 9. Qe6+ Kd4 10. Qxf5
>>                                    Kc4 11. Qe5 Kb4 12. Qd5 Ka3 13. Qb5
>>                                    Ka2 14. Kc3
>>bad move from hash table, ply=24
>>               25    49:14     ++   1. Bg2!!
>>         (2)   25-> 169:09  10.50   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 d2 5. h7 Kg5 6. h8=Q Kg4 7. Qxf6
>>                                    Kf4 8. Kxd2 Ke4 9. Qe6+ Kd4 10. Qxf5
>>                                    Kc4 11. Qe5 Kb4 12. Qd5 Ka3 13. Qb5
>>                                    Ka2 14. Kc3
>>               26   202:48     ++   1. Bg2!!
>>               26-> 311:56  10.89   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 d2 5. h7 Kg5 6. h8=Q Kg4 7. Qxf6
>>                                    Kf4 8. Kxd2 Ke4 9. Qe6+ Kd4 10. Qxf5
>>                                    Kc4 11. Qe5 Kb4 12. Qd5 Ka3 13. Qb5
>>                                    Ka2 14. Kc3
>>               27   369:56     ++   1. Bg2!!
>>               27   693:33  Mat150   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 Kf3 5. h7 Ke4 6. h8=Q Ke5 7. Qe8+
>>                                    Kd4 8. Qf7 Kc5 9. Qxf6 f4 10. Qe5+
>>                                    Kb6 11. Qxf4 Kb7 12. Qe4+ Kb6 13. Qe3+
>>                                    Ka6 14. Kd2 Ka5 15. Qh6 Kb4 16. Qh5
>>                                    <HT>
>>               27-> 846:32  Mat150   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 Kf3 5. h7 Ke4 6. h8=Q Ke5 7. Qe8+
>>                                    Kd4 8. Qf7 Kc5 9. Qxf6 f4 10. Qe5+
>>                                    Kb6 11. Qxf4 Kb7 12. Qe4+ Kb6 13. Qe3+
>>                                    Ka6 14. Kd2 Ka5 15. Qh6 Kb4 16. Qh5
>>                                    Ka3 <HT>
>>               28   919:01  Mat150   1. Bg2 Kxg2 2. h4 Kf3 3. h5 Kxf4 4.
>>                                    h6 Kf3 5. h7 Ke4 6. h8=Q Ke5 7. Qe8+
>>                                    Kd4 8. Qf7 Kc5 9. Qg8 f4 10. Qf8+ Kc4
>>                                    11. Qh8 d2 12. Kxd2 Kb5 13. Qb8+ Kc5
>>                                    14. Kd3 f3 15. Qc7+ Kd5 16. Qd7+ Kc5
>>                                    <HT>
>>
>>Mate in 150 , wow :-)) .
>>
>>pete
>
>I do not believe that crafty can see mate in 150 with no tablebases.
>Even with tablebases I expect shorter mates.
>
>It seems that this Mate in 150 is a bug in crafty.
>
>Uri


nope.  Max mate it can see (search only) is a mate in 32 (64 plies.).  It can,
of course, see mates in 150+ with tablebases + search, and that is possible
here (ie a forced trade into a hard tablebase mate can produce such nonsense
scores).



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.