Author: Roger
Date: 16:03:45 03/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
Yes, the only way we will ever know that the games are fair is if she loses. Let us hope she loses, because we will at least know for sure that the games are reality, rather than just a simulation created for us on her one gigahertz machine. I suspected as much from the beginning, and have always wanted her to lose for this reason. I just hate it when I can't tell if things are fake or not. I think that if she wins, this alone is reason enough to have her title taken away as a cheat. If she has any morals at all, she will lose and keep the title of woman's world FIDE champion free of disgrace. Roger On March 12, 2000 at 15:34:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: >Now Xie has more than 4 days to pratice against Deep Junior 6.0 using her >recently purchase AMD ATHLON 1000 Mhz according to my informer from china. >It is not quite the same Junior 6.0 compare to DJ 6.0 which use a Quad 550 Mhz, >but at least she can force her computer to take twice the amount of time to >analyze different responses and see for herself which course of action to take >since Junior 6.0 will give her different evaluations based on different moves. >It is not fair for Deep Junior team, especially Amir to continue game 1 >previously adjourned, because of the home analysis with a program 90% similar to >Deep Junior 6.0 programmed by the same programmer. Therefore, if game 1 could >not have been continued immediately as game two, of course Xie Jun has the >advantage in this case. And again after the 16 of March she should not have any >excuses, since her other tournament will not take away her total concentration >with this match.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.