Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 12:40:33 03/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 2000 at 15:00:49, Inmann Werner wrote: ><snip> >> >>I have been using R=3 near the root and R=2 near the leaves for a long while. >>I have had the idea on my 'todo list" for trying continuous values rather than >>discrete values, since I already do fractional plies. IE R=3 near the root >>tapering to R=2 near the leaves, but maybe R=2.5 in the middle, roughly. > >Can we (again) define, what r=2 and r=3 mean. > >search with : depth-r-1 >or depth-r > >so, is r the real reduction compared with normal search, or....? > >Werner R is *extra* reduction (comparing to reduction of 1 ply for normal moves). So (depth-R-1) is actual depth after null move. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.