Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:32:40 03/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 30, 2000 at 15:04:09, Inmann Werner wrote: >On March 30, 2000 at 11:07:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > >>Here is mine: >> >>1. hash table move. >>2. captures that don't appear to lose material using a SEE procdedure, >>ordered from biggest gain to equal exchanges. >>3. 2 killer moves. >>4. up to 4 history ordered moves (history heuristic) >>5. rest of the moves. > >question to 5) >here is the rest of the non capturing moves and the "loosing capture" moves. >Which of them should be searched first? > >IMHO the non capturing moves. > >Werner In my case, losing captures come first, but only because that is the way they appear in the list. IE I generate captures, sift the good ones to the top, and leave the lemons at the bottom. Later I generate the rest of the moves and add to the list, which places them after the lemons...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.