Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:37:25 04/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2000 at 21:56:22, robert blackwell wrote: >Well lads im not here for a fight. Its seems that it gets very ugly here when >someone states and opinion base on personally findings. I have played maybe 100 >games total between chess Tiger and Fritz. Tiger seems stronger.You all ask for >me to post, yet i bet you never even played over the games i posted. Game two is >a brilliant game, Tiger's ability to Activate its pieces is incredible. Also it >played themes of chess, not just try to open the position, and crash threw with >tactical shots. For instance the trapping of the knight on h4. What impressed me >is the fact tiger plays and understands the position, perhaps weak players cant >grasp this. Too bad! No one every questioned Enrique Irazoqui results. His games >showed tiger 100 elo pointa above the other programs!. Funny how we forget! I know Tiger is a great program, but I am interested in your findings about the autoplayer. Please post the results of 100 games (played without autoplay??) and your autoplayed games so we can see what you are taking about in regards to tiger doing much better when the autoplayer is not used. I assume you have the hard data, since you seem to be so sure of your conclusions about the chessbase autoplayer.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.