Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 10:04:59 04/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2000 at 03:36:15, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On April 10, 2000 at 11:30:23, blass uri wrote: > >>On April 10, 2000 at 03:24:17, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >> >>>On April 10, 2000 at 01:48:40, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>Thanks for SSDF! Crafty's rating is only 2 points from Hiarcs7.32! Wow. And >>>>note, that with Celeron PC Crafty runs relatively 30% faster. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>The SSDF can not tell us how good Crafty really is. >>>They may only give us a lower bound for the strength of Crafty against >>>computers. >>> >>>My Crafty doesn't use the chessbase interface. >> >>Do you have a proof that not using the chessbase interface help crafty? > >No. Did I say that not using the chessbase interface helps Crafty? >But it may help me. > >> >>>My Crafty uses the Nalimov egtbs - without the SSDF space limitations. >> >>The same limitation are also for other programs like >>Junior6a,Hiarcs7.32,nimzo7.32. > >So what? >I don't have those limitations. Neither do I. Tony >> >>>My Crafty runs on two processors. >> >>Deep Junior can also run on more than one processor. > >Yes, Junior is the only program from top of the list that can use more >than one processor. The list however says nothing about the smp efficiency. > >> >>> >>>But I use Crafty now for several years, so I don't need anybody to tell me >>>how strong Crafty really is. >>> >>>Someone in the past stated that commercial programs are at least 100 rating >>>points stronger than Crafty, so now we may ask: >>>Where are the commercials??? >> >>This was based on blitz games and not on tournament time control games. > >I didn't remember that. > >> >>Uri > >Kind regards >Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.