Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 14:30:10 04/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2000 at 14:00:13, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On April 11, 2000 at 09:54:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>>>Not a problem. Didn't vote for you this time. Thought you were too young >>>>and hot-headed to be a moderator. Nothing has changed that opinion yet... >>>You seem to be ignoring the fact that moderation is a team effort here. >>No I'm not. When a police officer sees something obviously illegal under >>way, he takes care of it first, and then asks questions to see if his initial > >You're still absolutely ignoring the fact that it wasn't "obviously illegal." > >NOBODY (except you, of course) thought it was obviously illegal. Everybody >thought RR = Ossi. > >Your pathetic explanation for why it's obviously illegal is that Ossi would have >said, "Here's an e-mail I wrote..." > >I've already explained why this is silly. But think about it another way. When >you write a post here, do you precede it with, "Here's a post I'm writing..."? >No, obviously not. You hope that the reader will see your name at the top and at >the bottom and can make the assumption that YOU wrote the post. What's different >in the RR situation? You see Ossi's name at the bottom and a fake name at the >top. What's to imply that Ossi isn't using the fake name? Now, I assume you >don't speak German and you might not recognize the name as fake; this makes my >judgement (although eventually proven wrong) better than yours in this case. > >Here's another thing to think about. When you quote a message on CCC, doesn't it >get preceded with "On ... Tom Kerrigan wrote:" so as to save you some typing? If >you quote something, the obvious course of action is to attribute the quote. >This wasn't done in RR's post. > >Now, if you can think of some OTHER reason why RR's post was "obviously >illegal," I'm sure everybody would like to hear it. > >With regard to the name calling, I'm thinking of something you said: > >>>>Not a problem. Didn't vote for you this time. Thought you were too young >>>>and hot-headed to be a moderator. Nothing has changed that opinion yet... > >I assumed that you meant my handling of this situation was immature and >hot-headed. But if you just wanted to call me names, fine. > >-Tom Hi! I believe it's legal to post this letter at least in Sweden and Europe. 1. It's not a private e-mail it's from a company 2.Threats against an organisation 3.Threats against a private person. 4. Accusations against another company, of course this company could take legal actions against this letter. Note I haven't published the letter. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.