Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 09:41:18 04/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2000 at 10:40:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>So you "handle" 100 e-mails per day. What does this matter? Does that somehow >>make writing a short e-mail really hard? >It means (a) I am busy and (b) you had already read the thing and responded, >so it was obvious you had seen it. I couldn't imagine _anybody_ not knowing >that posting private email is wrong. Okay, maybe you ARE busy. I don't know how fast you type, but personally, I could get the point across in about a minute. It's not that complicated. But if you don't have a minute to spare in your entire day, fine. (Although I find this hard to believe, because you seem to have more than enough time to argue with me. Or is arguing with me a really high priority for you?) As for part B, this still makes no sense. Just because I read and respond to a post doesn't mean it was the correct response. In fact, you supposedly knew it was the INcorrect response. So regardless of your disbelief at how stupid I am, you still knew it was the incorrect response, and you did jack s*** about it. >>So I read and responded to it. But you say you knew I was making a mistake. >>What's to keep you from e-mailing the moderators and saying, "hey, you're making >>a mistake." The mistake could easily have been corrected with your input, but >>you obviously elected to complain about bad decisions instead. >Didn't someone post a response to you that said just that? Again, I don't >'duplicate' if I can help it, as it wastes time. No. Only Bruce responded, and he basically urged me not to delete the thread. (I guess Bruce didn't know that posting private e-mail is wrong either, huh? Too bad you didn't help us all out.) -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.