Author: blass uri
Date: 06:06:13 04/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2000 at 06:27:19, Lin Harper wrote: > I have to say I'm sceptical about games played with auto player > software, because more than one person has commented that games played > manually give quite different results. Games with different hardware or different time control relative to the ssdf give different results. It has nothing to do with the autoplayer. There is no proof that games with the autoplayer give different results relative to games played manually on the same conditions. I've played against earlier > versions of Fritz and got thrashed quickly. I last longer against > CM6K, but in a match played manually, CM6K vs Fritz6 on equal hardware, > my money would be on Chessmaster. I think that if the match is long enough then CM6K has no chances because CM6k has no learning function. A short match prove nothing and every result is possible in short match. I am more interested in a match similiar to the nunn match except the fact that the starting positions are based on the positions after 15 moves in one of the last GM tournaments so no program is prepared for it and we can see which engine is better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.