Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 10:47:28 04/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2000 at 17:10:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 17, 2000 at 08:54:13, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>In addition to your list below, the auto232 for DOS does not support >>underpromotion !!! >>It also reveals some timing problems. >> >>IMO, your critics given below is fully justified. It rather refers to the >>auto232 in general (not particularly to the chessbase implementation). >> >>One has to be aware that results of long auto232 matches have to be checked >>carefully. >> >>I agree fully to your points. >> >>Regards, Uli > > >me too. > >the question is: how many points are/were looked at in the data the >ssdf present us TODAY ?! That one is easy. We check EVERY game result. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.