Author: KarinsDad
Date: 10:56:10 04/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2000 at 09:26:58, Tom Likens wrote: >On April 26, 2000 at 17:39:38, Vincent Vega wrote: > >>Chess programs are GM-level now and they should be super GM-level in 3-4 years. >>It may be much harder to make improvements then because strong players' input >>will become less and less useful, databases of GM games could be a hindrance >>instead of help, and even-time games against GMs will be too one-sided to offer >>much help finding problems with the programs. Will the competition between >>programs be the only driving force for software improvements? Or will time >>handicap games versus humans become common? > >A large reason for the dramatic increase in computer chess has been the >fantastic increase in home computer processing power. Most of the best >programs are tactical monsters. But, it is highly doubtful if any program >has an evaluation anywhere near as sophisticated as the top Grandmasters. > >And this is where IM/GM can make contributions for a long time to computer >chess. I don't believe it is any coincidence that after Joel Benjamin >joined the Deep Blue team it made an incredible leap in strength. Even >though Joel is nowhere near Kasparov's strength. > >--Tom People underestimate the opening theory imparted by Benjamin to the Deep Blue team. Also, Benjamin once had a draw against Kasparov, so he is not exactly a putzer. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.