Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: chain of responsibility

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:43:11 05/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 03, 2000 at 01:15:11, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On May 02, 2000 at 10:02:29, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>this happened on ICC the other night.  Fortunately I had the KRPP vs KRN
>>position.  In that position, I _know_ I will either win or draw, while my
>>opponent apparently thought he was winning.  And he missed the one golden
>>opportunity to trade the knight for my two pawns.  And went down in flames
>>a good while later...
>
>Does your program think it is better, or just not terribly bad?
>
>bruce

Depends on how far the pawns are advanced.  KRN vs KRPP gets evaluated as
draw, at worst, for the KRPP side.  IE I know that the KRN side can't win,
so I at least hold the score to zero for that side.  And if the pawns advance
a little, they will pull the score in favor of the two pawns.

I wouldn't say it is 'perfect' but it is the right idea.  KRN can't win,
KRPP can't lose.  So the score stays at zero or favors the KRPP...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.