Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessfun and Nunn1 Tests

Author: Chessfun

Date: 16:48:38 05/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 05, 2000 at 19:38:24, Walter Koroljow wrote:

>I have followed your results with great interest and I hope you continue.
>Please.
>
>I have noticed two problems with this thread: very high standards for
>experimental results and very loose standards for accusations.
>
>With limited resources it is impossible to achieve mathematical certainty in an
>empirical study.  Just like in our everyday experiences.  However, I think we
>can (and do!) absorb the information from both sources and become more
>knowledgeable.  I would say that we can all learn from even a poor study if the
>study conditions are explicit.  In this case the study was not poor and the
>conditions were explicit.
>
>I would suggest that the standards for a useful accusation should be much much
>higher than those for a useful report.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Walter


Walter,
      Thank you for your nice post !!. And thoughtful considerations.

Thanks.










This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.