Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 12:43:01 05/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2000 at 13:41:23, Mike S. wrote: >To avoid any misunderstanding: I too have the opinion of course, that the >heuristics, tree search, evaluations etc. of the engine is the main part of a >chess program. I appreciate any knowledge increase of a chess engine. The >databases are just useful supplements for the opening and, in some cases (but by >far not in all games), for the ending. >Btw., I think this database access methods are not that simple, as we know from >the constantly developed and improved ideas of opening trees, opening learning, >"dynamic" endgame access, compression of tablebase data to fit into RAM, etc. - >there's a lot of programming intelligence in this parts too. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl Of course there is programming intelligence in these parts. But is a programm intelligent because of this too? Martin Schubert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.