Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not AMD K6 / PENTIUM based electronics chess-boards?

Author: Francesco Di Tolla

Date: 02:50:28 10/22/97

Go up one level in this thread


On October 19, 1997 at 06:08:30, Alessandro Morales wrote:

>Imagine a 50x50 cm wooden-like sensor board, based on an AMD K6 166 Mhz,
>with a little display, a simplified OS, that has a lot of RAM for hash
>tables and it is compatible with some kind of card-programs, producted
>by all top
>level chess programmers and sold at the same price of a PC program....
>:-) (Something like consoles). A nice business both for dedicated chess
>manifacturers and programmers!...(They cold still offer hardware
>improvements
>and software updates.)
>
>Without MONITOR , HD , VGA , SOUND CARD etc. it could have an affordable
>price.

I think that the board is not strictly needed, I would prefere a
poket-calcualtor/palmtop-like object to be able to carry it the train
or so.
I think also that a K6 would be damn bad cause of the huge power
consumption, and I don't want a huge battery, the IDT-C6 (yapc*)
is a much better candidate,  since it requires much less power
(11 Watt at 200 MHz, against 15 for the iP200MMX, 18 for the M2 and
21 for the K6) and is in the P200 range.
For such a litlle-portable-chess-monster that CPU would be fine,
[well I still loose most of the games against Fritz 4 on a K5 Pr133
at blitz....]

But then at a tournmanet (for humans :-) we would need cameras in the
restrooms....


bye
Franz

* yapc=yet another pentium clone. Take a look at
http://www.winchip.com/.
  [disclamer: I have no relation with IDT].



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.