Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 07:44:46 05/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2000 at 10:09:47, William H Rogers wrote: >We saw a game played last year with the computer winning the game without ever >getting out of its opening book. It gave mate without ever having to use its >evaluation engine. I did not and still don't think that unlimited books should >be allowed. What I mean by that is, I don't think that computer books should be >allowed to go any deeper than say 10 moves. If this were the case, I think that >the games would be more realistic and even whether they played humans or other >computers. I know that a lot of people disagree with me, but this is my feeling >about the subject. >Bill Hey Bill, I wouldn't mind sharing that view if you don't mind :o). Sincerely, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.