Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:52:26 05/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2000 at 20:02:15, Hans Gerber wrote: >On May 10, 2000 at 18:40:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 10, 2000 at 15:11:37, Hans Gerber wrote: >> >>>Thanks for the clarification. Now would you please join me in finding some >>>objective _scientifical_ control? >> >> >>I have been as clear here as I know how. There is _no way_ to provide the >>kind of control you want. It is _impossible_... > >End of the debate for the moment between the two of us. > >Two things: > >I have made my claim. The importance of control in science. > >You have insisted that this is not doable in computerchess. > >Baseline, let's wait until a new paradigm will be born in computerchess. Thanks >for your patient explanations. suits me. :) the famous irresistable force vs immovable object physics question. :) Bob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.