Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:20:08 10/22/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1997 at 09:55:03, Chris Whittington wrote: >I expected a few p2 300's. Don't really approve, but their advantage is >not going to be 3.5 x as with liquid nitrogen cooled alphas, is it ? Good question. I have no idea what the difference is between a K6/233 and a PII/300. I can give you some hard number for Alpha, but not for a 767 mhz Alpha. With my program, running an Enorex 500 mhz Alpha (1mb cache), it appears that the Alpha is 1.5x faster than my P6/200. This is based upon a run of the LCTI test at 210 seconds per position (98 minutes total). Running on a Polywell 533 mhz Alpha (2mb cache), mine goes 1.75x faster than my P6/200, based upon the same test. I have heard that a K6/233 is faster than a P6/200. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.