Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:38:12 05/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2000 at 06:58:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 11, 2000 at 06:06:54, Chessfun wrote: > >>On May 11, 2000 at 05:01:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On May 11, 2000 at 01:10:51, Chessfun wrote: >> >> >>Didn't you just cover this in the other post. >>Well I guess this deserves a separate single post.? > >Maybe not, but you finally managed to answer the question. Then maybe you should direct me to where this specific question was asked of me prior to now. >>Correct. The moves were and are within the evals. >>But as can be seen it is posted as a question since I know something >>is wrong. It is not possible to play Nunn at given time X then replay >>the same way and get a difference of 15-5 - 9-11. So something must >>be wrong but at that point I wasn't sure what and I assumed I would >>receive suggestions as to what the problem could be. > >Sounds reasonable, except that it is possible to get very different results. >Even though it is very unlikely to achieve such a difference. Hmmm I thought that is what I said. You answer sounds like double talk to me. I think you are saying you agree in a roundabout way. >>The rerun proofed the score of the original score. > >This is my only problem so far. It doesn't prove anything, it suggests. Proving >is something entirely different. It's not just semantics, or an attempt to >instigate a quarrel. You are correct....suggests is a better word to have used than proofed. >>The moves in the 11-9 games were within F6 evals. But the depths of >>those moves were not as deep as they should have been given the same >>time for the move in analysis. This as stated elsewhere was discovered >>by Uri as being the case for Crafty at 25/0. It was at that point that >>this was discovered and since I have made no posts on the subject since >>that time so there is no post where it is stated. > >Thank you, was it that difficult? Difficult....Mogens if you ask reasonable questions without trying to put me down then in return you will get reasonable answers. If you ask a specific reasonable question you will get a specific reasonable answer........amazing how that work huh. See Mogens, even the tone of such a remark "Thank you, was it that difficult?" sounds degrading and condescending. And appears IMO that you do it with purpose. When you say things as said to Uri in post: http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?110101 I am only amazed that Uri would ever want any further communication with you. I only quote this as an example as it seems you do it in a lot of your posts when others happen to disagree with you. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.