Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Clarification if Cheating could be excluded from Computerchess

Author: Hans Gerber

Date: 16:19:52 05/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2000 at 17:30:25, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On May 12, 2000 at 10:44:02, Hans Gerber wrote:
>
>>Yes, this is an article in the NY Times. I showed elsewhere that this article
>>could not be regarded as a proof.
>
>What more do you want?  Videotape?  I'm sure somebody has one somewhere...
>
>Dave

Excuse me, I don't need a direct proof myself, but a proof as such. I had stored
that story _without_ Kasparov publicely accusing the DB team of cheating,
neither asking them for the prints. I had memorized that he did that in
"private".

Perhaps you can understand my astonishment that R. Hyatt repeated his memory
that went into the direction of a press conference directly after game two.
Interesting that one special bit was a quote from a private talking that was
surely not being made in public nor on a press conference. (I  mean his
expression, it played soo good and then it should have overlooked this..., as I
said this was reported by F. Friedel.)


The article in the NY Times is important because it made something public what
probably had been kept in privacy by Kasparov until then.

But don't misunderstand me as if I wanted to favor any side or version of
history. So, if you had exact memory about a press conference after game two,
where K. made these accusations, then please say so. Up to now nobody confirmed
that.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.