Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: another result of the arms race

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 05:10:49 10/23/97

Go up one level in this thread


On October 23, 1997 at 07:34:54, Chris Whittington wrote:

>
>All those alpha fans will be pleased to know that Thorsten is now going
>to bring a german p2 300, purchased at the last minute, to Paris WMCCC.
>
>Stupid, pointless waste of money, result of the ridiculous, last minute
>arms race we have each year.
>
>How much have we all spent, ahead of time, paying premium prices for
>this fast hardware ?

By the time this tournament ends, I will have spent, oh, somewhere
around *nothing*...  But a P2/300 is certainly welcome.  You'll be
somewhere close to my 500mhz alpha...




>
>Thanks very much to the firms of alpha or dec or kryotech or whoever it
>is, who want to pay out time and expense for their own promotional
>purposes by supplying a few 'amateurs' with ridiculously fast hardware;
>and to the 'amateurs' for asking for it in the first place so they could
>get way ahead of the field.


sarcasm is wasted.  Alphas were participating *before* I played in my
first WMCCC event last year.  As were sparcs that were far faster than
the
486's a year before.

As I've said before, either get together and change the rules, or stop
the whining.  If the rules allow a supercharged motor, *someone* is
going
to show up with one.  If you don't, you get smoked.  So disallow super-
chargers, get one of your own, or get run over by others.  Choice is
simple...

>
>How much simpler it all would have been if we could have stuck with the
>K6 233's ?
>
>Maybe, before time, we could make an arms race agreement for the next
>year ?
>
>And, one last point: if these strong amateur entries are being funded
>and subsidised by major hardware manufacturors, who will no doubt use
>any good results for their own purposes; how can the hardware
>manufacturor - 'amateur' combination possibly be entering the WMCCC on
>free entry with full amateur status ?

Same argument holds for the AMD K6 machines.  someone is "donating" them
for the tournament.  For what reason I wonder?  Perhaps free publicity?
So in that logic, *everyone* is professional except for the ones that
tote in their own machines..


>
>Seems insane to me.
>
>Yet another point. AMD sponsored the tournament, produced a mass of kit;
>and have now been upstaged by other manufacturors supplying machines at
>even higher specs, and all for the cost of shipping 3 alphas to Paris
>only.
>
>Seems unfair and unreasonable. hardware manufactors thinking of
>sponsoring future events - think again.


what *is* sort of stupid is to obtain equipment that doesn't touch the
leading edge.  If the WMCCC equipment was leading edge PII/300's, this
would not be possible.  Or if AMD had pre-released the K6/300's for this
event, ditto.  But the K6/233 is not anything special at all.  So they
deserve any bad rap they get, since they are behind the rest of the
microprocessor industry in speed once again...


>
>Chris Whittington



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.