Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Top Programs Are at least IM strenght, Probably Better. No Doubt Anymore

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 08:07:03 05/17/00


Hi:
That best programs are IM strenght is not a novelty. I think I have seen many
post by Bob saying that, but in any case if a shadow of a doubt still existed,
the tournament in Holland has given another proof of it. Now IM lose
systematically to best programs or get a draw or win just once in a while. Now
an IM winning a top program IS the new. Respect GM, that's another history as
much as the "GM" expression encloses a very wide category. There are worlds of
difference between a normal GM and one of the top ten or one of the top five.
Seems like differences between players get bigger the highest his capacities.
Between a 1600 and a 1500 elo player there is not really a big gap, but between
a 2500 and a 2600 there are parsecs of distance. So the discussion should be:
which kind of GM top programs already are or are near to be? My guess: they are
or near to be member of the pack of low level GM's. Another guess: they will be
top 50 GM's class in 5 years at most. And ten top in 10 years, excepto if
something unexpected happens, like the fall of an asteroid on Earth.
Fernando



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.