Author: ujecrh
Date: 00:36:14 06/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2000 at 23:53:17, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On June 29, 2000 at 23:16:02, robert michelena wrote: > >>In other words, there are 2 levels of members; the favored who can remain >>anonymous, and the rest of us who are singled out. >> >> >>Doesnt seem fair to me. Why not require Karinsdad and Tina and the rest to >>abide by the same rules as everyone else? > >I assume it's mostly because of logistics. > >It would be a mess if we demanded a real name from every CCC member at once. >It's much easier one at a time. > >Besides, if you were around before the policy was instated, and you haven't been >kicked out yet, then you are probably not a big threat to the well-being of CCC. >If you just signed up an hour ago with a fake name, I'd be much more worried. > >If you think there's a legitimate reason why your name shouldn't be publicly >known, contact the moderators and we might be able to accomodate you. It makes a lot of sense. Finally, we are here a bunch of people friendly sharing a common hobby (or more than a hobby for some of us which are even more respected), I see no need to be rude, we can have tolerance, flexibility and freedom. On the other hand anonymous accounts must understand that this is not a shield for them and that moderators might even be harder with them if they behave badly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.