Author: ujecrh
Date: 09:55:15 06/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2000 at 12:21:46, KarinsDad wrote: > >I guess you did not carefully read my post. > >I don't care what name people use on the forum. > >I think it a wise idea that ICD get poster's real names (to the best of their >ability without going overboard on it) I did read carefully and understood your post, my point is that "the best of their ability" will hardly be enough to get rid of cheaters but far enough to get rid of honest ones with obvious pseudos. I much prefer to see a post form "KarinsDad" than from "Roberto Fischer" (soory if that one exists, it is not on purpose :o) because at least I have no doubt about the first one being a pseudo. > and to keep that information private. This is very hard. >People given the privilege of read-only would not have to give any information. And we risk to have always the very few same posters. Even if they are often the most interesting to read, diversity is great and some less knowledgeable ones can sometimes start interesting topics. I understand you as well as those that are completely pro or against anonymous accounts, probably none of us is completely right or wrong, this is a matter of debate but the final choice may have a big influence on what ccc will look like in coming months and years. And, to be completely fair I think it is much more important to keep people like Mr. Hyatt or Moreland (and many more) here than people like me because they are the heart of this club, we all read their posts, get answers from them etc. But it would be nice to keep all those that want to participate and not destroy. Take ChessFun for example, she is not a computer chess expert programmer but she brings a lot of life here too. Ujecrh
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.