Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dr. Hyatt is right about chess programs not being GM level.

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 03:32:11 07/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2000 at 18:13:40, Adrien Regimbald wrote:

>Allo,
>
>>Dr. Tinsley '94 and Chinook '94 were about equal.  It's tough to compare Dr.
>>Tinsley '57 and Chinook '00 though.
>
>
>Exactly :P  I don't think we will ever know the answer to this..  or the answer
>to what if Tinsley was alive now, in his prime, and had the benefit of all of
>the new knowledge that is available..
>
>
>>I don't know why you say that the top human players can still beat it once in a
>>while.  Please cite the game.  My understanding is that it hasn't lost a game
>>since the last time Tinsley beat it.  It has since clobbered both the reigning
>
>
>My burden of proof here is to find one game, and within 3 minutes of looking, I
>found one :P  I'm sure that with more digging, more such games could be found.
>
>
>Lafferty vs Chinook (1994, Boston, after the Tinsley vs Chinook match which
>Tinsley bowed out of due to sickness):
>+1 -1 =18
>
>
>FYI, Lafferty currently (as stated by the web page when looking at the bio for
>him) has a winning record against Chinook.
>
>You can see a lot about Chinook at:
>http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~chinook/
>
>And in particular, match info at:
>http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~chinook/matches.html
>
>
>>human world checkers champion and the reigning human world correspondence
>>checkers champion.  We're talking +8 -0 =12 types of scores, and checkers is
>>much more drawish than chess.
>
>
>I don't think it's quite that severe - I would guess that if Chinook were to
>play the best ranking player in the world who was prepared for such a match a
>long series of games, I would expect to see something like this:
>
>Chinook wins: 20-25 % of the games
>Chinnok losses: 5-10 % of the games
>Draws: 65-75% of the games
>
>
>Adrien.

I forgot that Lafferty got one off of it.  Still, as of a couple of years ago,
Ron King (who was champion at that time, might still be <shrug>) had never
beaten it.

The +8 -0 = 12 might have been +7 -0 =13, I don't recall exactly, but that was
the actual score against the correspondence champion when they played a match.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.