Author: Pete Galati
Date: 11:32:02 07/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2000 at 12:19:06, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On July 02, 2000 at 11:57:46, Pete Galati wrote: > >>All this would do is provide interesting data. But the amount of reads that a >>post gets isn't very relavent to it's suitability to be in the forum. The real >>problem here is moderation for the sake of moderating. >> >>By _now_ I've come to realize that almost nothing needs to be moderated. The >>place basically moderates itself. In anther thread, I just asked James >>Robertson if he was going to release his program Insomniac, but blsss thought it >>sounded like I was attacking him about that, so he spoke up and said something. >>No moderator was needed, blass stepped in and said something. >> >>A _large_ percent of what these guys do isn't needed. If they'd do less, most >>of their problems would go away, and everything that was too off-topic to be >>here would just expire and sweep itself under the carpet. No bean counter >>needed. The last thing we need is an ego feeding or crushing bean counter so we >>can have people writing posts designed to get more read counts. Because I'm >>sure I could adjust the way I title the subject of my posts to get more people >>to read them if I wanted, that's not very hard to do. > >I don't know if I agree with you, but you sound like an excellent moderator >candidate. The whole election thing is coming up soon, I guess. > >bruce I'd have to steal Mogen's platform for running because I liked his ideas. I wouldn't have made a bad politician because I usually try to agree with whoever I'm talking to. I'd have to tone up my backpedaling muscles before I ran. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.