Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 15:15:01 07/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2000 at 17:57:43, Chris Whittington wrote: >Imagining all great men are English is a data failure. Or it could just be good >for you (if you're English, your English). > >Mixing "your" and "you're" is a processing failure. > >Fortunately, flakey memory is less important than flakey process. You can cure >one with an encylopedia. You need an education to cure the other. > >Touche. Or not. We are all flawed humans. Youd [sic] be better getting me on its >and it's - I'm very flakey on those. Or you could try ridiculous and rediculous >- good and famous on this ng (it was a good 'fake-alike' detector before the >perpetrator realised). Seperate and separate - also. > > >Chris Whittington I never confuse "you're" with "your" or "it's" with "its". It happened because I changed my mind about the sentence in question and typed too fast, which is an internet hazard I believe. But if you're convinced that your estimation of my apparent mistake is correct, don't change it on my behalf. Good excuses are, as they say, easy to come by. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.