Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 17:54:28 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2000 at 20:00:34, Ralf Elvsén wrote: > >Maybe it wasn't the mentioning of CW that was the tricky part? Maybe >it was your use of a description of a mental disorder to describe >your contempt for him that was objectionable, and that alone would have >caused "someone" to ask for your post to be removed, regardless of >the victim of your fury? Fury is somewhat overstated :), there are more important things in life to rage fury over, and CW is certainly not in that league. The fact that CW is not able to defend himself here anymore(directly)lays more weight in the scale for me for removing a posting than people complaining in anonymity about a lack of political correctness or becuase of oversensitiveness on their side. My description of CW might have been harsh, and hard to swallow, but not derogatory. I haven't noticed any comtempt in my deleted post, as I didn't have contempt for him. His acting here and on internet are sad to see and pathetic, and are supported by the fact that a board CCC is not willing to tolerate his posting here, and his scattered postings on usenet always leads to fights. Giving a judgement about someones intellectual capabilities is something completely different than saying someone is a bad individual. Many participants here have a problem with distinguishing between those two. As I am not the standard for CCC behaviour, I should have taken that into account. Sorry Ralf, your exegesis of my post was very kind, yet it doesn't descibe what I had in mind :) Jeroen ;-}
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.