Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 18:21:14 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2000 at 20:28:55, Pete Galati wrote: >On July 06, 2000 at 20:00:34, Ralf Elvsén wrote: > >>On July 06, 2000 at 18:11:51, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >> >>>Better stop this thread, before your post will be wiped away. >>>CW is a tricky subject, as I understood from the deletion of one of my posts. >>> >>>Jeroen ;-} >> >>Maybe it wasn't the mentioning of CW that was the tricky part? Maybe >>it was your use of a description of a mental disorder to describe >>your contempt for him that was objectionable, and that alone would have >>caused "someone" to ask for your post to be removed, regardless of >>the victim of your fury? >> >>Ralf Elvsén (no CW-fan) > >It's amazing that someone complains, so a post gets deleted. That's not good. >Everybody's got to be politically correct at all times to post here, and >_that's_ objectionable. > >So instead of reading Jeroen's post, and then moving on to the next item, people >actually spent the time to send a moderator email just so that Jeroen's post >(correctly I might add) pointed that CW lacked certain social skills (in so many >words), so that this could be corrected by a moderator? > >What a waste of time all around. > >Pete My reply above to Jeroen will answer these complaints of yours. Note in particular the "politically correct"-issue. Just because you aren't (or so I assume), doesn't mean that all who disagree with you are worried about political correctness (damned english, did I get that right?). My reaction to Jeroen's post was a knee-jerk reaction, not something I consider to be a proof of my refinement. Ralf P.S Now move on to the next item :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.