Author: Robert Sherman
Date: 20:36:14 11/09/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 1997 at 16:48:21, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi Robert: >Puzzled by your example -by the way, what a wonderful attack game, >congratulations!-I played the same moves against CST setted at 40 moves >in 670 minutes, my usual rythm, and althought CST follows the same moves >until NxR, then there are some changes and finally a much better >defense. After Qh5, CST plays first Bf2+ and then, after Kd1, plays h6. >Then, after Nxc7, far to capture the knight with his queen -the mistake >that is the key of your combination- CST just take white Knight in g5 >and then I cannot see -a firsdt cursorely glance, if I am wrong let me >know- how white can proceed fronm then on. CST calculates less than 4000 >n/s in my MMX 200 againts the almost 90000 of Rebel 9. Hi Fernando: I presume that you mean the CST doesn't castle. It sounds like CST is winning, but just to make sure could you post the way CST handles this game and then I will analyze it. Robert Sherman
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.