Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 04:13:34 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 06:56:25, blass uri wrote: >On July 14, 2000 at 06:12:50, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On July 14, 2000 at 04:55:49, blass uri wrote: >> >>>I read that adams prepared a line that he won Deep Junior in blitz. >>>If preparing at home a line against a computer is not anti-computer play then I >>>do not know what is anti-computer play. >> >>Don't all players prepare lines against a computer at home? > >I suspect that not everybody. >I know that judit polgar used her normal opening against Fritz in 30 >minutes/game and lost 4.5-1.5 > > I believe the term >>is analysis. The variation of the Ruy Lopez that Adams played might not be the >>most usual one, but it's far from unplayable against a human opponent. At least >>as far as I know. >> >>Best wishes... >>Mogens > >Anti-computer variations are not unplayable variations but variations that were >prepared against the computer. > >Uri This variant of Ruy Lopez is played when a chess player wants to tie. The variant is itself already a anti-computer line, because the games are usually positional. If you play a positional variant, is much easy to choose a dificult position for programs. Do you remember the game Rebelx Hoffman, when Hoffman, with the black pieces, played Benko Gambit? Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.