Author: blass uri
Date: 10:40:04 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 13:23:14, Alvaro Polo wrote: >On July 15, 2000 at 13:00:17, blass uri wrote: > >>On July 15, 2000 at 12:51:03, Alvaro Polo wrote: >> >>>On July 15, 2000 at 12:08:14, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On July 15, 2000 at 11:59:08, Michael de la Maza wrote: >>>> >>>>>Junior is humming along, not losing a single game, and forcing some of the best >>>>>players in the world to play perfectly in order to salvage draws. >>>>> >>>>>Then Kramnik illustrates how to punish Junior. >>>>> >>>>>_All_ of the GMs _instantly_ get it. Some of them apply the lessons better than >>>>>others, but all of them make Junior look silly and none of them lose. >>>> >>>>silly? >>>> >>>>I do not agree. >>>>You must be very smart in order to draw against GM's like anand and akopian. >>>> >>> >>>In Anand's case the smartness belong to J6's operator. >> >>I disagree. >>Junior got equal positions against anand. >>Anand offered a draw because he knew that Junior is probably smart enough not to >>lose aganst him. > >Junior got equal position against Anand, yes, but after just 20 moves. This is >too little, in my opinion. Who knows what could happen 20 moves later? That's >why I say that the "smartest" move was done by the operator. > >Alvaro I disagree. The position was position that computers know to play and this is the reason that anand agreed to a draw. Maybe Junior could win without the move that you called "smartest" move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.