Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I am not a pronoun

Author: Pete Galati

Date: 17:05:20 07/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 17, 2000 at 15:53:25, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On July 17, 2000 at 15:48:59, Jari Huikari wrote:
>
>>On July 17, 2000 at 15:23:12, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:
>>
>>>"I agree with pete galati - x should know better"
>>>"I agree with pete galati -  (however) pete galati should know better"
>>>"I agree with pete galati - (I) should know better"
>>>"I agree with y - pete galati should know better"
>>>
>>>Who is x? Who is y? *Is* Pete Galati or isn't he? Or is he just a bit Galati?
>>>
>>>I'm thoroughly confused by this kind of ambush posting.
>>>But hey, I suggest the best answer is:
>>>Pete Galati doesn't know better.
>>
>>No, no! Brian agrees with Pete Galati. Together they (Brian and Pete) should
>>know better than Jerry (alone). This is just an example of democracy. Simple,
>>eh?
>
>Why don't we just go with pure pronouns, and then it can mean anything you like.
>;-)

I am not a pronoun, I'm strictly an amateurnoun.  But I play a pronoun on TV.

Him



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.