Author: Eran
Date: 08:31:41 07/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 10:50:23, stuart taylor wrote: >On July 18, 2000 at 09:52:34, James Robertson wrote: > >>On July 18, 2000 at 01:49:26, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On July 17, 2000 at 22:12:39, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>> >>><snipped> >>>>Computers spend much longer on a position when their evelution goes down as they go deeper. >>> >>>humans also spend more time when there are in trouble >>> >>><snipped> >>>>That's why they make boring games. They defend against the opponents >>>>profoundest attacks, and don't bother making very profound attacks themselves, >>>>as once they find a reasonable move, they don't look further. >>>> They will never apply the dictum, "if you see a good move, don't play it, but >>>>look for something better". >>> >>>This is wrong. >>>computers always look for the best move. >>> >>><snipped> >>>> Human are the opposite. They play to win, due to their very nature. They >>>>cannot spend their entire energy just on defence, and to avoid defeat. >>> >>>They can and khalifman is not the only player who did it succesfully against >>>Deep Junior to get a draw. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Yes, Bareev was amazing. I am still confused as to why Huebner resigned when he >>had excellent drawing chances, considering the way other humans were able to >>draw when more than a pawn down. >> >>James > >Humans do the best they can with defence, and the same goes for attack. >Computers only do the very best they possibly can, when it comes to defence. > Also, defence is more tactical than attack-as we are speaking about the >excecution stages, whereas attack starts earlier. Pure tactics = defence, >favours computers anyway. I think Rebel Century is the best program with defence. Eran
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.