Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:39:59 11/21/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 1997 at 10:33:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 21, 1997 at 06:37:08, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On November 21, 1997 at 03:09:46, Moritz Berger wrote: >> >>>On November 20, 1997 at 18:00:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>>Is this true? If it is, then Under 2/40 time conditions Fritz 5 is >>>>>stronger than Rebel 9, MChess 6, and Genius 5. >>>> >>>>I don't believe in these results. >>>>Fritz5 is not stronger than Rebel9 or Mchess6. >>>> >>>>Maybe stronger than Genius5, because Genius5 is not very strong. >>> >>>Funny to read this ... My Fritz 5.01 results are >60% against M-Chess 6 >>>and Rebel 9 and <45% against Genius 5 ... ;-) >> >>Which doesn't contradict Thorsten's statement. It's the overall results >>what counts, and then I think F5 is as strong as Genius 3/5, but less >>(by some 50 points?)than Rebel 9, the strongest and most convincing of >>all. >> >>Enrique >> >>>Moritz > > >I don't follow: > >Fritz wins >60% of the time against Rebel9, but that doesn't contradict >that >Rebel 9 is stronger than Fritz 5 by 50 Elo points? What am I missing in >the >above??? Easy. It happens often that A beats B, B beats C and C beats A. A may end up with 45%, B with 55% and C with 50%. B may lose to A and still be XX Elo points stronger than A. We all have seen this happening many times. Take a look at SSDF's games and lists and you will find it there too. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.