Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 16:23:32 08/08/00
Surely you have noted how much coincidental are the moderations philosophies of the candidates. With maybe one exception -and perhaps is just a matter of wording- we will face a difficult choice between all of them, except for reasons of friendship or simpathy. In doctrine they are all almost equal. I am glad it is so because that coincidence has been produced, mostly, around tolerance. If you take a look at what moderators profesed two or three elections ago, you will see a great difference. Off topic post are by now universally accepted -just in a degree, but of course always its number will be just a matter of "degree" anyway- and in general the attitude of everybody seems to me more friendly and less harsh and threatening. Probably this is a signal of the maduration of the entire site. We know each other a lot better, difficult guys were executed long ago -maybe not always with reason, but the result is more peace, no doubt- and so we are almost arriving to a point when will need to elect a non-moderator guy, a profesional warmonger to enliven this place. Just a joke... Fernando
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.