Author: Christoph Fieberg
Date: 15:01:54 08/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2000 at 17:46:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 10, 2000 at 17:22:58, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>On August 10, 2000 at 16:17:47, Christoph Fieberg wrote: ... >>>Fritz 6 reached depth 5 after 9 hours!! (on Pentium III, 500 MHz, 32 MB Hash) He >>>showed 61. Dxe4 Txe4 62. dxe4 Lxc5 3. Txg4 hxg4 as best moves (+1.56 for White). >>>What is the best move? >>> >>>Christoph >> >>nine hours to get to depth _five_ ? hard to understand. I think something is >>wrong. > >It is very easy to understand. >If a program does a lot of extensions it need 9 hours to get to depth 5. > >The position that was posted is a position when some programs do a lot of >extensions because there are a lot of possible captures. > >The position is not position from a practical game and I do not know about cases >when there were so many captures in a practical games. > >Uri Interesting question. What practical game had the position with the most possible captures? I would also dare to say that the position I invented is very close to the absolut maximum. Who can invent a position where Fritz would need even more time to reach depth 5? Christoph
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.