Author: pavel
Date: 03:40:29 08/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2000 at 05:50:13, Aaron Tay wrote: >On August 20, 2000 at 01:47:04, pavel wrote: > >>be compiled with additional codes in the engines. Probably nothing complex, >>probably same as winboard but differant output commands. >>now tell me how can you tell for sure that chessbase (after adding the >>neccessary codes) compiled it correctly without making any mistakes? . >>after all it is not being done by the author of the program himself (eg, >>bringer, lilgoliath, sos , comet......etc). > >>well you might say the author dont have the interest on compiling each version >>for chessbase GUI.......in this case why not use the winboard adapter? >>you might say > >>its not well known?? (great reason).......well NOW you know it ;)) > >Winboard adpator? Lots of well known problems with that..The native versions are >stronger by far..LOL > >But it's best of course if you can auto=play using the winboard versions.. login to chessservers like chess.net and ICC you will find MANY computer accounts thats uses winboard adapter to make chessbase engines play online with winboard. they literally plays HUNDREDS of games......they dont have any problem ;) trust me pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.