Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 03:59:49 08/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2000 at 06:55:12, pavel wrote: >On August 20, 2000 at 05:45:42, Aaron Tay wrote: > >>On August 19, 2000 at 19:57:56, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>After we have played a reasonable number of games we are going to change to the >>>latest version. I believe Crafty is better in Chessbase GUI because of the >>>better book and good book-learning. >> >>Sure under chessbase gui it gets a better book. But why do you say better >>book-learning? >> >>IMHO the book learning that comes with the winboard Crafty is superior to >>chess base's.. >>Also does the position learning work when using in chessbase? > >definately not. >chessbase interface does not support positional.lrn for crafty. >and i agree with you crafty has better book.lrn feature. >though both are done differant ways, but IMO crafty's one is superior. > >the book thats better for junior does not necessary mean its good for hiarcs. >the book thats good for fritz does not necessary mean its good for nimzo >the books thats good for the chessbase engines does not necessary mean its good >crafty. >if it is so then anyone can come with a "good" opening book and run all >programs with that particular book. Why do they bother to make differant books >for differant chess programs? really!! why? You are talking about fitting the program style with the opening book. True to a extent I guess, but I suspect, most amuteur opening books not checked by experts have some fairly big blunders that are bad objectively. That is where the commerical books are superior in the avoiding of such errors./ >'to me' it looks like 'yet another tweaked crafty'. Well, they never claimed it was anything but Crafty..The question is whether this tweaked crafty clone is better..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.