Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF(Crafty 17.07 - SOS)AMD K6-2 450, 1.5-7.5, now 2.5-12.5

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:14:18 08/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2000 at 10:04:18, pavel wrote:

>On August 22, 2000 at 04:14:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 22, 2000 at 04:01:09, pavel wrote:
>>
>>>On August 21, 2000 at 11:17:21, Aaron Tay wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 21, 2000 at 10:33:08, pavel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>whats wrong?
>>>>>the whole idea is wrong.
>>>>>as I have said before the 'only fair way' is to run crafty under winboard.
>>>>>and that is 'the bottom line'
>>>>>or unless bob compiles one for CB interface ......
>>>>
>>>>>or these games are just a matter of wasting time ;)
>>>>
>>>>>pavel
>>>>
>>>>Hmm I suppose the SOS used is the one in the Young Talents Cd? Correct me if I'm
>>>>wrong but those programmers don't compile the CB versions themselves either
>>>>right? Just like the free native CB versions of Crafty,Comet,Faile etc..
>>>
>>>all CB compatible versions those source code are not available publicly (comet,
>>>bringer, sos) are compiled by the author themselves.
>>>there is no other way out.
>>>
>>>CB guys cannot compile their own version for comet or sos, unless the author
>>>gives them the source code........'of course' they will not give them their
>>>source  code :))......that goes for comet,sos bringer and others......
>>
>>I disagree with this of course.
>>The programmers will give chessbase the source code because they want to have a
>>chessbase engine.
>>
>>SOS is commercial in the young talent and people buy it.
>>The programmer probably knows that if he is not going to give chessbase the
>>source code it is not going to be an engine for chessbase.
>>
>>Bob Hyatt explained that it is impossible for him to compile crafty as an engine
>>for chessbase without having the chessbase source code and I do not think that
>>chessbase will give their source code for the programmers of SOS or other
>>chessbase engines.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
> as far as I know you dont need the source code of fritz to compile a version
>for fritz interface.
>the only differance between fritz and winboard is the output command.
>in fritz's case it is probably 'more complicated'.
>In winboard forum there was this post about how to make chess programs that run
>on winboard, CB compatible.
>I have to look for it though......
>
>No one will give away their source code "just like that" to make it compatible
>for CB.......it is absurd !!
>would you give away your source code to someone just to make it compatible for
>CB??.........i dont think so.
>like it or not. winboard is more popular and people can live without making
>their program CB compatible.
>CB winboard adapter wouldnt be so famous ( as it is now) if you needed to give
>your source code to the CB guys "just to make it CB compatible"
>I 'disagree' and 'I think' i can prove it........
>
>thanks
>
>pavel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.