Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 13:33:15 08/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 08:06:00, Brian Richardson wrote: >I think the information that many programs report, such as depth, score, PV, >etc) is helpful to see, and appreciate most programs doing so (particuarly when >their operators are online, or even some that have lists of opponents to >automatically kibitz). > >However, each program reports in a different manner. I would like to propose >_some_ reporting uniformity. I am not suggesting that standardizing _all_ >information and formats should be attempted. > >In particular, the search "depth" seems like a good place to start. Depth can >mean several different things. This would be nice, but its impossible. I do a lot of razoring, and futility pruning. It happens that I have some variants searched to only 3 ply on an otherwise 7 ply search. Null Move Cuts add to the same problem. In addition I am testing fractional ply deepening, and how do I report that ?! :) Regards, Georg v. Zimmermann Sunsetter (C) Crazyhouse/Bughouse Chess
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.