Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 13:17:12 09/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2000 at 15:50:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2000 at 15:24:51, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On September 05, 2000 at 14:54:23, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>I do not see a reason that you think that paying money for the programmer is >>>right when paying for a beta teter that I see as part of the team behind the >>>chess program (assuming that the information of the beta tester was productive >>>to improve the program) is not right. >> >>I'm not interested in paying money for the programmer :o). >> >>You're already getting paid indirectly be being a betatester as you don't have >>to buy the program you're testing. That is more than sufficient payment IMHO and >>that goes for most people I think. > >I do not think that you are right. >Most people will say that getting the program that you test is not sufficient. > I do not know who is right or who is wrong but this makes an excellent poll question: Do you think that chess beta-testers have sufficient "payment" by not having to buy the program they test? -Yes. -No. -Do not know / abstain. > Unless you think you're something special >>when it comes to chess software, or the Universe in general. > >I believe that I have some productive ideas for chess program that I did not >discover and chess programs do not use. > I would love to see your ideas in action, in your own engine or in somebody else's (but I think you expect to be paid for sharing your ideas). How is your engine going? Any chance to see it playing in the near future? José. [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.