Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:28:43 09/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2000 at 16:36:56, Christophe Theron wrote: >On September 12, 2000 at 15:55:29, Chessfun wrote: > >>On September 12, 2000 at 15:17:19, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 12, 2000 at 14:55:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On September 12, 2000 at 09:21:06, José Carlos wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anybody knows? That was a really interesting match. >>>>> >>>>> José C. >>>> >>>>I remember a few draws in a line where both were directly out of book. >>>> >>>>After i've put in some cool russian killer lines i'd be happy to >>>>again keep the match. >>> >>>The games were without books. >>>I do not see how to put killer lines without books. >>> >>>If you want to play with books then tiger may choose a different lines and your >>>killer lines are not going to help. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >> >>As I recall they started in book. Then after the killer lines subject >>came up I suggested they play the first game and then switch the next >>game to the spot where they came out of book, that was taken up. Then >>Tiger played without book, Diep with book...at least to my best memory. >> >>Sarah. > > >That's right. I had first suggested to let Tiger play without book (before the >match started). Then Thorsten started the match and noticed that Diep did not >have enough randomness in book moves choice, and kept replaying the same games. > >That's where he stopped. I remember that vincent claimed that Diep did have some small randomness and suggested to continue the match without books(He claimed that after enough games Diep is going to stop to repeat). The problem is that vincent's behaviour probably convinced thorsten to stop the match. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.