Author: pavel
Date: 20:21:45 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 23:11:03, Chessfun wrote: >On September 21, 2000 at 21:29:44, pavel wrote: > >>On September 21, 2000 at 17:14:26, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On September 21, 2000 at 09:28:45, pavel wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> few mins ago, i was watching some games played by the beta version of >>>>chesstiger in chessnet vs an account called FRITZ-X, as i was talking to the >>>>operator of the FRITZ-X, he told me that he is a beta-tester for chessbase, but >>>>at that moment he was using gandalf (betaversion) to play against >>>>chesstiger(beta) (account G-N-U). >>>>So I ask him , whats his impression about gandalf, as a beta tester of >>>>chessbase. >>>>he told me that gandalf is likely stronger than fritz6a but not as strong as >>>>fritz 7. >>>>he also told me that fritz7 is a dual processor version of fritz6a. >>>> >>>>with all said gandalf won 2 games in a row against chesstiger.....(beta). >>>>ofcourse gandalf had hardware edge...:) >>> >>> >>>The edge you speak of was: >>>Fritz-x 600Mhz 600 mb hash. >>>G-N-U Cel 433 48 mb hash. >> >>yes thats true.......also gandalf was running manually under CB interface. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>>ps, I am no longer associated with fritz beta-team.... >>> >>>OK....why? >> >>I think I already told you why by e-mail, >You did? ok sorry I'll check. > >>by the way, it seems you removed CT from ICS, does it have anything to do with >>the games that I posted here? If so, I am sorry. > >Definately nothing to do with it. thanks god , and I was bitching myself for it .....:) Though you could have posted the >games you played it with the Standard (C) account :-) >Maybe you could confirm the processor that standard uses.? notemook pentium 400mhz (very very slow compare to most cpus) 8mb hash, (though I have 64mbram), I use this computer more often. also its easier for me to use even when i am not at home. I like to observe the game while its playing.... > >Here are the only results against other computers. > >Tiger Beta 12.92 on Cel 433 48 Mb hash. > >Utuerke (Comet B26) +3 =5 -11...Tiger wins 11. >All games 5 min 2 inc >Comet on AMD K6-III-450 >1 game at 45 min 2 inc drawn. > >Bryant (Crafty 17.12) +2 =4 -6...Tiger wins 6. >All games 5 min 0 inc >PIII OC to 868 Mhz > >Standard (Nimzo2000b) +0 =1 -5...Tiger wins 5. >All games 5 min 0 inc >PIII 500 >1 game at 15 min 5 inc won by Tiger. now that you know its pentium 400mhz, as a matter of fact I am playing against G-N-U (c) at this moment (G-N-U is running yace beta version) won 1 lost 1 > >Episcopal (Nimzo2000b) +0 =3 -1...Tiger wins 1. >2 games 3/0 2 games 5/3 >PIII 800EB 128Mb hash >Tiger wins 1 of the 3/0 games. > >These results were till today. I know of the two games >you posted but haven't checked any other games played. >From what I have seen considering the disadvantage in >processor Tiger beta has been performing excellently. yes true indeed, on same hardwares the games would be more interesting to watch. though. I believe gandalf is also a true genius :) Pavel > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.