Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 21:05:41 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 23:36:05, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 21, 2000 at 23:04:59, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>Why don't you read Vincent's original post a bit closer? >>He says: 'would be interesting to seehow Gandalf evaluates this now!' >>So clearly he is not making any conclusion about the current version. > >That's completely irrelevant, because he claimed that Gandalf should have a >preference for solving sacks, which he knows absolutely nothing about. And then >he continues from there. That's the error. > >>I'm thankful that people like Vincent still post interesting things on CCC, >>otherwise we would just have the usual endless debates about whether computers >>are GM strength, or the results of the latest coin tossing experiment. > >Certainly, but let's try to cling on to something that at least resembles fact >at the same time and avoid ramblings. I think that perhaps you should take a little of your own advice. > >>Back to the subject: can anyone post Gandalf analysis for that position? > >Yes. But contrary to what Vincent originally claimed, it's not particularly >happy before or after the sac. As a curiosity Gandalf prefers 14.e4 (+2.00) >instead of the Diep sack. I guess this proves the sacking preference once again >and its happy attitude. Furthermore, I was unable to reproduce 7... Bd6 nor 9... >Nbd7 within reasonable time and Ba6 is no longer a chooseable book move, so... > >1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 d5 5. Bg2 Ba6 6. cxd5 exd5 7. Nc3 Bd6 8. >O-O c6 9. Bg5 Nbd7 10. Qa4 Qc8 11. Nh4 b5 12. Nf5 Bf8 13. Qb3 g6 14. Nxd5.... > >I could restart the analysis before 14.Nxd5 and post it, if it has any interest. > >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.