Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 21:15:04 09/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2000 at 08:44:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 22, 2000 at 22:50:44, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>I was using pre 18+. > >I doubt that has any significant influence on the result in either direction, >unless Dieter made changes that benefits the null_l 4 setting somehow in later >versions. The only version I have that uses the old book format is pre 12, >because I've been overwriting the older versions successively. Fortunately, I >had one old version in my Fritz Light engines dir. Either way, Sarah will >probably test the newest of the old bookformat prerelease verions, so we'll see. > >So far it's 15.5-14.5 for default settings against null_l 4 at G/10' with pre >12. I'll make a book for pre 21 and try that version against LG2000 with and >without null_l 4. > >Mogens. Here are the actual results of the null_low test I ran: yace_null_test 2000 1 yace_null_test_4 68.0/117 2 Junior 6.0 2760 6.0/6 3 Fritz 6 2752 4.5/6 4 Nimzo '99 4.0/6 5 tcb 2505 3.5/6 6 gromit 2468 3.0/6 7 anmon 2529 3.0/6 8 EXchess 2377 3.0/6 9 zchess 2440 3.0/5 10 crafty 2634 2.5/6 11 Comet 2510 2.5/6 12 little goliath 2567 2.5/6 13 ant 2345 2.5/6 14 Hiarcs 7.32 2718 2.0/6 15 arasan 2360 2.0/6 16 yace_prune_test 1.5/5 17 yace 2539 1.5/5 18 Doctor? 3.0 2442 1.0/6 19 amy 2511 1.0/6 20 knightx 2328 0.0/6 21 faile 2192 0.0/6 FYI, all games played are against Yace. Time control was 4 2 blitz, run with ponder on (it was off for maybe 2 rounds as I tried to have then use one cpu but had memory problems). JW
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.