Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: what about chess tiger II ported to linux !?

Author: Pete Galati

Date: 15:44:13 09/29/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 29, 2000 at 17:48:15, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On September 29, 2000 at 17:13:30, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>I for one would like to see either chess tiger II, rebel 11, or junior 6 for
>>linux or at least a good reason not to make a port like that as the unix
>>community seems to be growing and I think for the most part like chess. :)
>
>
>
>I think I could port the Chess Tiger engine to Linux in less than a week, as it
>is entirely written in C. I use the GCC compiler everyday to work under DOS
>(actually the DJGPP), so compiling to Linux would only involve system-specific
>issues, probably no compiler specific issues.
>
>The Tiger engine has been recently ported to another system running a different
>processor family than the x86, so I guess I have solved most of the portability
>issues by now.
>
>The only problems I see are commercial ones. Are there enough people ready to
>pay for Linux software? Is the system going to be improved and more user
>friendly? Are there good copy-protection schemes for Linux?
>
>When we get a positive answer to all these questions, then we will certainly go
>for Linux.
>
>I know the system is evolving quickly, and a lot of energies are now focused on
>it. I hope Linux will offer a serious alternative to Windows in the near future.
>Wait and see...
>
>
>
>    Christophe

If I were you (I'm not) I would consider approaching it like what was done with
Gandalf for Winboard, only do a Chess Tiger for Xboard.  You'd be the first kid
on the block to offer a commercial Xboard engine (for whatever that's worth)

Pete



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.