Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:50:49 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2000 at 10:02:20, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 08, 2000 at 09:46:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>And I supposedly produced some of those? where? > >There haven't been that many, but I think you'll find quite a few in your >dispute with Chessfun. Where you obviously changed the initial conditions of the >argument, because you didn't want to admit your own error. I know I'm not the >only one with that perception. An apology wouldn't be out of order IMHO. > >Mogens. What "initial conditions" did I change? Just because she assumed some very narrow interpretation of "I have seen"? I didn't give that impression. As I said, "I have seen" has a very precise meaning according to my Webster's. The only error I made was the confusion between beta tiger and "gambit tiger". I quickly admitted that mistake. I made no other.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.